America Looks Forward: Obama's Second Term
By Kathleen Fitzpatrick '15 and Catherine McNally '15
On November 7, 2012, in the early hours of the morning, Barack Hussein Obama II stood in front of hundreds of enthusiastic supporters in his home of Chicago, Illinois, and delivered his second presidential acceptance speech. Conversely in Boston, Massachusetts, Willard “Mitt” Romney delivered his concession speech.
Obama, incumbent president of the United States and former Democratic senator of Illinois, defeated Republican Governor Romney in one of the closest general elections this century. Millions speculated on the outcome, which only hours before had been practically unforeseeable. President Obama, however, emerged victorious, winning 332 Electoral College votes and 51 percent of the popular vote.
This year’s election was important for several key reasons. The president will have the ability to select one or two Supreme Court justices. Although the Supreme Court is currently controlled by conservative justices, President Obama may soon have the power to change that. He will also have the power to help determine the future of the nation’s economy, and influence the federal stance on healthcare.
The three presidential debates this fall each played a major role in this election. In the first debate, Governor Romney came prepared, hoping to use this opportunity to call Barack Obama out on some of his weaker spots in his presidency, emphasizing the country’s considerable national unemployment rate of 7.9 percent. Likewise, Obama came prepared with rhetoric regarding multiple inconsistent statements made by Romney and his campaign in the Republican primaries and the general election.
Each candidate represented a different future for our great nation, and exhibited these beliefs in the three national presidential debates. This election was not just a choice between a Democrat and a Republican, the real choice was between the candidate’s beliefs on central issues, both of a domestic and foreign nature; and though there were many relevant topics, health care, specifically “Obamacare”, seemed prevalent. Obama and Romney shared different views, Obama supporting his national health care bill, which requires employers to provide healthcare for all employees. Romney supported a different approach, implementing a system of vouchers.
One especially pressing issue of this election was the economy. Ever since the economy crashed in 2008, Americans have been struggling to recover. Though the recession officially ended in July of 2009, many people have been unable to resume the jobs and positions they previously held. Unemployment is currently at 7.9%, excluding those who have given up their search for work (in which case the number would be closer to 14.7%). Clearly, the economy has a long way to go before it completely recovers.
This year’s election brought to light the increasing polarization in American politics. Tensions escalated as two very different candidates battled for the presidency. The stark differences in the parties’ opinions resulted in friction between parties and a significant rise in hostility. Republicans and Democrats differ on most important issues such as the way health care and the economy should be handled. Unfortunately, this increase in polarization is unlikely to cease simply because the election has ended. Republicans and Democrats seem to be polar opposites, and cannot seem find a common ground on Capitol Hill or even in their respective parties. The divide regarding fiscal and social matters is prominent, and we must join together as a nation and hope, that the president will be successful in guiding our nation.

CURRENT EVENTS
An Inspiration for the World, and Especially for Young Women Everywhere
By Christina Fitzgerald '14
Members of the Taliban shot Malala Yousafzai a 15-year-old girl from Swat Valley, Pakistan in the head and neck on October 29, 2012. This act was due to Malala’s courageous attempts to inform the world of the ban placed on women’s education. Malala was moved to Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham, England for further recovery.
In 2009 Malala began blogging for the BBC after her father Ziauddin, an education activist, was asked if women in Swat Valley would write about life under the Taliban and their atrocities towards women. A girl named Aisha volunteered from Malala’s father’s school, but then took back her offer because of the fear of the Taliban. Malala started recording diaries of her own experience at the age of 12 for the BBC, revealing to the world how women in her country were banned from receiving an education. In 2009, the Taliban commanded that girls would no longer be able to attend school after January 15, 2009. The Taliban blew up hundreds of girls’ schools, enforcing their view on women receiving an education. After the ban was enforced they continued to ruin more girls’ schools. Malala was even more determined to not let this keep her from what she knew was right. She continued to study. Many private boys’ schools pushed back their opening, but not one girls’ school had any intention to reopen after the ban.
But on February 21, 2009, the leader of the Taliban announced that although the ban on women’s education would be withdrawn, the girls would have to wear burquas to school. The people of the Swat Valley were displaced by the Taliban fighting with the Pakistani Army. It was during this time that Malala professed her decision to go into politics, though she had once wanted to become a doctor. On October 9, 2012, the Taliban tried to kill Malala for her defiance of their control on women. The day after the attack the spokesman for the Taliban accepted responsibility as Malala "is the symbol of the infidels and obscenity” that they are against.
On October 15, 2012, Malala was moved to Queen Elizabeth Hospital in England. She has not suffered any serious brain or nerve damage. She has been able to walk, write, remember and talk, and has shown positive signs of recovery.
Her fight for women’s rights in Pakistan against the Taliban revealed her courage, persistence and ambition for standing for what she believes in. On October 15, 2012, there was a petition from England’s former Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, to support Malala and her fight for women’s education. People find Malala as a truly inspiring young heroine for girls and women everywhere.
Sources: "Pakistan Police: Arrests Made in Child Activist Shooting". VOA news. 12 October 2012. Retrieved 12 October 2012.
In this year's Massachusetts Senate election, Republican Senator Scott Brown and Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren discussed many important topics. Along with the important issue of the economy, healthcare was the issue highlighted the most in debates and interviews.
When Brown was elected in January 2010 to fill the late Senator Ted Kennedy's seat, he objected to the passage of a national healthcare law, otherwise known as the Affordable Care Act. Scott Brown believes that Massachusetts' healthcare system is excellent and other states should create a similar one, but the national government should have a limited part in healthcare insurance. Brown's view of healthcare does not align perfectly with the views of other Republicans. In 2011, he voted against the Republicans on an issue related to Medicare. Overall, Brown thinks state governments should have the decision over the national United States government.
Elizabeth Warren is the Democratic opponent for Senator Scott Brown. She is a strong supporter of the Affordable Care Act. She believes that the act is a significant accomplishment because it gives a basis for improving the healthcare in America. She argues that the act will lower the cost for insurance. According Warren, when health insurance is cheaper, Americans stand to benefit. Also, Warren highlights that another part of the act will allow young adults, until they are 26-years-old, to stay on their parents' insurance.
Overall, Scott Brown and Elizabeth Warren both realize that healthcare is a critical issue in America. Scott Brown's view is that the states in the nation should have control over the healthcare in their own state, while Elizabeth Warren sees it as the national government should have control.
Sources:
Senate Office. On The Issues: Every Political Leader on Every Issue. "Scott Brown on Health Care". 2012. Web. 6 November 2012. http://www.ontheissues.org/social/Scott_Brown_Health_Care.htm.
E. J. Dionne. The Washington Post Opinions. "Elizabeth Warren on Health Care and Religion".
2012. Web. 6 November 2012.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/elizabeth-warren-on-health- care-and-religion/2012/08/23/5c509058-ed6c-11e1-9ddc-340d5efb1e9c_blog.html.
Brown vs. Warren: Healthcare
By Alessia G. Hughes '16